Fat is the new Black Attacking someone for being fat should be a hate crime, campaigners say.
They want so-called "fat-ism" to be made illegal on the same grounds as race, age and religious discrimination.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/8314125.stm
Morris- 10-19-2009
Surely attacking someone is illegal, whatever their weight...
Bulldog- 10-19-2009
Surely attacking someone is illegal, whatever their weight...
Physically attacking them is, sure. It's called assault.
But now, the law says that an assault is a worse offence if the motivation for the attack is a "hate crime"
"Hate crime" is defined in English law as crimes "motivated by the victims race, colour, ethnic origin, nationality or national origins, religion, gender or gender identity, sexual orientation or disability"
What we have here is a move to add fat people to that list.
But why stop there?
Why not include people with ginger or blonde hair (all those blonde jokes will be outlawed), or people from Essex (a persecuted group if there ever was one), or what about bald people or ones with beards or moustaches?
mike casey- 10-20-2009
I have every sympathy with fat people who have genuine glandular problems. Millions don't however. They are lazy and eat far too much. When they finally acquire some self-discipline and go on a diet (those who do) they are given bravery badges on those gaudy TV shows where every human being is a fab person and deserves a big hug.
Why do these people always win and when the hell are we going to stop being so painfully nice to everyone with a hard luck story? Things would improve dramatically if pandering clothes stores revised their size ranges along the lines of Small, Medium, Large, Fat, Very Fat, Oscene Great Sweaty Whopper, Orca and the premium Blue Whale collection.
I tell you, I'm miles ahead of those marketing wimps....
Bulldog- 10-20-2009
I have every sympathy with fat people who have genuine glandular problems.
What?
Is there a gland that makes em greedy basdids?
Clarkey49- 10-20-2009
What really should be included as a hate crime is attacking someone because of the sub-culture they belong too. i.e. Goth, Emo, Chav
The killing of Sophie Lancaster should have been classified as a hate crime.
Bestbear- 10-20-2009
Clarkey, I don't know what you will think of this? In my humble opinion crime is crime. Assault is assault. Theft is theft. &co.
There were laws enough to deal with any crime without introducing this nonsense about "hate crimes" which is supposed to make it worse.
There should be no such thing in law as a "hate crime". Crime is crime. "Hate crime" is just one step away from "thought crime". And not a long step, either!
What do you think?
Clarkey49- 10-21-2009
This is true but some how attacking someone because they're black or a goth is worse than attacking them because they've got money or because they've yelled at you...
Bulldog- 10-21-2009
This is true but some how attacking someone because they're black or a goth is worse than attacking them because they've got money or because they've yelled at you...
Why?
I don't necessarily disagree by the way, but I wonder if the reason why we feel that way is because we've been affected by the propaganda?
Clarkey49- 10-21-2009
It seems worse to me because attacking someone because they're different is something that packs of animals in the wild would do...
Reflexively attacking someone because you don't identify with them seems, somehow, like travelling back on the evolutionary chain
Bulldog- 10-21-2009
It seems worse to me because attacking someone because they're different is something that packs of animals in the wild would do...
Reflexively attacking someone because you don't identify with them seems, somehow, like travelling back on the evolutionary chain
But of course we are animals, and we do display strong herd/pack instincts.
Look at tribalism in Africa. They are all the same colour but they still hate and sometimes kill each other because they consider "the other lot" to be different.
Look at football supporters, they are (by & large) mainly white, but they still howl insults at the other lot and occasionally bash each other up, simply because "the other lot" support a different team.
Look at religious conflicts. Say no more squire.
Look at politics. "I 'ate phucking Tories I do!"
I suppose it's just how we are. Don't suppose it'll ever change.
Clarkey49- 10-21-2009
Yet, we are meant to be better than pack animals. However it probably is true that we will always see things as us and them. We still should attack or kill people because of that
Bulldog- 10-21-2009
We still should attack or kill people because of that
or for any other reason (aside from defence)
Clarkey49- 10-21-2009
Whoops! Should have put shouldn't there. It just strike me as worse if there's no other reason to commit a crime other than some instinct that shouldn't apply to modern day life.
It seems that not even self-defence is acceptable these days. A man in our area used a small amount of force to eject a youth that had just attacked him physically and verbally. He'd called the police several times in the past month to complain, yet when they finally did come it was to arrest him for assault. They fully intend to charge him too.
Bestbear- 10-21-2009
Whoops! Should have put shouldn't there. It just strike me as worse if there's no other reason to commit a crime other than some instinct that shouldn't apply to modern day life.
It seems that not even self-defence is acceptable these days. A man in our area used a small amount of force to eject a youth that had just attacked him physically and verbally. He'd called the police several times in the past month to complain, yet when they finally did come it was to arrest him for assault. They fully intend to charge him too.
Yes .....
So it goes.
Forumer™ is Voted #1 Free Forum Hosting provider
Build your own community today with the largest message board hosting company.