Blair accuses Brown of ‘hubris and vacuity’
Tony Blair has delivered a savage attack on Gordon Brown in a secret memo accusing him of playing into David Cameron’s hands by his ‘lamentable’ and ‘vacuous’ performance as Prime Minister. The former Prime Minister boasts that Mr Cameron was ‘in trouble’ before he resigned a year ago. And he claims Mr Brown’s incompetence has made the Tories look like the party of the future and on course to win the next Election. The memo reveals Mr Blair’s fury at the way Mr Brown turned his back on his predecessor’s achievements, accusing him of ‘dissing our own record’. He pours scorn on Mr Brown for claiming he would turn his back on the ‘spin’ of Mr Blair’s ten years in power and replace it with a more ‘honest’ style. He says Mr Brown ‘junked the TB policy agenda but had nothing to put in its place’. The bombshell disclosure comes as it emerged that Mr Blair has had regular talks with his close friend and political ally, Foreign Secretary David Miliband, who challenged Mr Brown’s leadership last week. The memo shows that Mr Blair backs many of Blairite Mr Miliband’s private views about Mr Brown’s failings. And it blows the lid off public assertions that Mr Blair supports his successor, claiming Mr Brown has made ‘fatal’ blunders by disowning Mr Blair’s record; failing to produce new policies; distancing himself from the Iraq War; and leaving the political landscape ‘wide open’ for the Tories to take the lead. snip Extracts from the secret memo 'I am passing this message on to GB – not in these terms – and will try to help; but at present, there is every indication that the lessons will not be learnt. 'There has been a lamentable confusion of tactics and strategy. Tactically, it was thought clever to define by reference to TB i.e. this was not the era of spin, we are going to be honest, the style would change etc. 'Strategically the consequence was twofold: a) we dissed our own record – instead of saying we are building on the achievements, confronting new challenges, we joined in the attack on our own ten years – a fatal mistake if we do not correct it and b) because we were disowning ourselves as a government, we junked the TB policy agenda but had nothing to put in its place. 'So tactically we took the benefit of the anti-TB feeling, but strategically, we ended up accepting our opponents’ propaganda and appearing incapable of articulating a forward policy agenda. 'The real problem was not the brilliance of the Tory conference, but the hubris and vacuity of our own. This meant the Tories, by having something to say on policy, appeared substantial and to represent the future. 'The truth is that DC was in trouble long before TB left, but that was because he was being forced to choose on NL policy and found as a result that he couldn’t differentiate properly. The Tory policy is still not up to much but they are able to get traction on inheritance tax – unbelievably boosted by our own briefing – because otherwise the policy field is left wide open. DC is confused by proper strategy but immensely empowered by short-term tactics. 'The choice is and was always between GB running as the change candidate or as continuity NL. He never needed to worry about distancing on Iraq – it was never going to be seen as his issue; but he really needed to be seen as continuing NL not ditching it. By trying to be change, he played exactly the same game the media wanted but never the game that gives us the only chance of a 4th term.' http://tinyurl.com/58yplu

Pot calling the kettle black, I'd have thought. Mind you, we still have to find out if Young Dave, too, is all style and no substance. Spartacus